Legal Opinion

Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 2005No. Docket 249394PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Defendant Roman Catholic Archbishop of the Archdiocese of Detroit appeals by leave granted the trial court’s order denying defendant’s motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(7) in this case alleging sexual abuse by Robert Burkholder, a Roman Catholic priest. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in ruling that the applicable statutes of limitation did not bar plaintiff John Doe’s claims. We reverse because plaintiff has failed to state a claim for fraudulent concealment that would toll the statutes of limitation applicable to plaintiffs claims. While we are thoroughly…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moll v. Abbott LaboratoriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. De Haan v. WinterMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Haliw v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Stephens v. DixonMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Lemmerman v. FealkMichigan Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Zumpano v. QuinnNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Doe v. Archdiocese of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Anzaldua v. Neogen Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  5. Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. Bank of America Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API