Brigham v. H. G. Mulock Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On bill for injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
Leaming, V. C.
The bill does not disclose whether the deeds of complainant and defendant, and the several deeds in their respective chains of title, contain the restrictive covenants sought to be enforced, or the extent to which defendant may be charged with notice of these covenants, but as the right of complainant to enforce against defendant the observance of the restrictive covenants in question was conceded by defendant’s counsel at the hearing, provided complainant had not lost the right by reason of his own violation of the covenants or by reason of acquiescence in the violation of the…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Edwards v. WisemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Schadt v. BrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Ward v. Prospect Manor Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Johnson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Misch v. LehmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.