Legal Opinion

Olin Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 26, 1993No. 90-70452PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TANG, Circuit Judge:

Olin Corporation (“Olin” or “Company”) petitions for review of an order of the Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”) to divest assets acquired from the FMC Corporation (“FMC") and used to produce swimming pool sanitizing chemicals. The Commission ruled that Olin’s acquisition of these assets would likely result in a substantial lessening of competition in the relevant markets in violation of section seven of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18, and section five of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 45. We deny the petition for review.

I

This case…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of DentistsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Continental Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. General Dynamics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. International Shoe Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Staples, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
  2. Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. Lucas Automotive Engineering, Inc. v. Bridgestone/firestone, Inc., and Coker Tire CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Schering-Plough Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Saint Alphonsus Medical Center-Nampa Inc. v. St. Luke's Health System, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API