Legal Opinion
Levi Strauss & Co. v. Aqua Dynamics Systems, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 20, 2020No. 3:15-cv-04718Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LEVI STRAUSS & CO., Case No. 15-cv-04718-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. CONFIRM, DENYING MOTION TO VACATE 10 AQUA DYNAMICS SYSTEMS, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 101, 108, 116 Defendant. 11 12 Levi Strauss & Co (“LS&Co.”) moves to confirm an arbitration award against defendant 13 Aqua Dynamic Systems, Inc. (“Aqua”), secured through an arbitration before three panelists at 14 JAMS. Aqua opposes and moves to vacate that award, arguing that under Monster Energy Co. v. 15 City Beverages, LLC,
940 F.3d 1130
(9th Cir.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jean Schmitz Leonard Schmitz v. Carlos J. Zilveti, III Nicholas S. Meris Prudential-Bache Securities Inc., AKA Prudential Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States Life Insurance v. Superior National InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- New Regency Productions, Inc. v. Nippon Herald Films, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Simmerman v. CorinoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Monster Energy Company v. City Beverages, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019