United States Life Insurance v. Superior National Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
E. SHEA, District Judge:
We are asked to determine whether an arbitration panel violated the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. §§ 2-16. The process employed by the arbitration panel, which included an ex parte meeting with panel-retained workers’ compensation experts, was unusual; however, after deferentially reviewing the panel’s award, we determine that the arbitration process provided the parties with a fundamentally fair arbitration and that the arbitration award rested on a plausible interpretation of the governing arbitration documents. Accordingly, we affirm the arbitration award…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Johnson v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Move, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- LAS PALMAS MEDICAL CENTER v. Moore, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2010
- Immersion Corp. v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Unite Here Local 19 v. Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi IndiansDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.