Legal Opinion

United States Life Insurance v. Superior National Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 4, 2010No. 07-55938PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E. SHEA, District Judge:

We are asked to determine whether an arbitration panel violated the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. §§ 2-16. The process employed by the arbitration panel, which included an ex parte meeting with panel-retained workers’ compensation experts, was unusual; however, after deferentially reviewing the panel’s award, we determine that the arbitration process provided the parties with a fundamentally fair arbitration and that the arbitration award rested on a plausible interpretation of the governing arbitration documents. Accordingly, we affirm the arbitration award…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Move, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. LAS PALMAS MEDICAL CENTER v. Moore, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2010
  4. Immersion Corp. v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  5. Unite Here Local 19 v. Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi IndiansDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API