Legal Opinion

John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Setser

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1996No. A066741PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PHELAN, J.

John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company (hereinafter John Hancock or appellant) timely appeals from an order of the San Mateo County Superior Court denying its application for attorney fees (Code Civ. Proc., § 1021.6) 1 on the grounds that a fee award was barred by a good faith settlement (§ 877.6) between the plaintiff, Ruby Waldron (hereinafter Waldron or plaintiff), and the remaining defendants, Robert Setser, Sofian Susantio and Net Equity Associates (collectively, hereinafter, the Setser defendants or respondents). We conclude that John Hancock’s statutory claim for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. City of Sacramento v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Prentice v. North American Title Guaranty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Nest-KartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Bay Development, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. GACKSTETTER v. FrawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Burger v. KuimelisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
  3. Wilson, McCall & Daoro v. American Qualified Plans, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Appel v. Boston National Title Agency, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019
  5. Fennessy v. AltoonianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API