United States v. Upton
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
HERMAN, Senior Judge:
We hold that an omission in a letter recommending the substitution of a member of a court-martial is insufficient by itself to cast doubt upon the presumption of regularity accorded to the issuance of a court-martial order, when first presented at this stage of the case. We also find that the omission of the trial judge of the element of value in his instructions on findings was non-prejudicial error; nor was he required, sua sponte, to instruct the members respecting forms of punishment less severe than the maximum permissible. Finally, we hold that a portion of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. WheelerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. MasusockUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
- United States v. MoselyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. RyanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. FretwellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. GonzalezU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. CrawshawU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. WalkerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980