City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
Motivated by its interest in the safety and attractive appearance of its streets and sidewalks, the city of Cincinnati has refused to allow respondents to distribute their commercial publications through freestanding newsracks located on public property. The question presented is whether this refusal is consistent with the First Amendment.1 In agreement with the District Court and the Court of Appeals, we hold that it is not.
I
Respondent Discovery Network, Inc., is engaged in the business of providing adult educational, recreational, and social programs to individuals in the Cincinnati area.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by849 opinions
- Reed v. Town of GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- City of Ladue v. GilleoSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Florida Bar v. Went for It, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
844 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.