Legal Opinion

Standard Oil Co. v. Marlow

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 20, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Hobson—

Reversing.

The Standard Oil Company maintains an oil house at Burnside, Kentucky, and in February, 1911, had Willience Uhl in charge of it. Uhl had employed Willie Cox to paint some barrels that were in the house. Cox was fourteen years old. It was Uhl’s business to paint the barrels but he had agreed to pay Cox to paint them for him. ' While Cox was painting the barrels, Joe Mar-low, who was -ten years old and lived next door to the oil house, came along from school. Cox asked him if he did not want a job, and offered him ten cents to help him…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southern Ry. v. GoddardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  2. Corrigan v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. Wells v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Smith v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  3. Corlew's Administrator v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. MarlowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API