Legal Opinion

Standard Oil Co. v. Marlow

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 18, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*2OPINION OF THE COURT BY

WlLLIAM ROGERS CLAY, Commissioner

Reversing.

Joe E. Marlow, an infant, sning by Ms next friend, brought this action against tbe Standard Oil Company and its manager, William Ubl, to recover damages for personal injuries. On tbe first trial of tbe case he recovered a verdict and judgment against tbe Standard Oil Company for $3,500, and against William Uhl for $500.00. On appeal to this court tbe judgment was reversed for errors in tbe instructions.' Standard Oil Co., &c. v. Marlow, 150 Ky., 647. On tbe return of the case another trial was bad which resulted in a verdict…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cox's Admr. v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Cook's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. MarlowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. GoodeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Thoroughbred Motor Court, Inc. v. Allen Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1956
  3. Hostetter v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. HoweCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API