Legal Opinion

Dille v. Longwell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 7, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVermilion, J.

— The plaintiff sues to recover the amount due on a promissory note. This is the third appeal in this case. The first, appeal (169 Iowa 686) ivas by defendant from an order overruling a motion to transfer the cause to the equity docket. The answer contained an allegation that it was the understanding and agreement between the parties to the note that it should draw no interest, and that, through mistake of the person drawing the note, it contained a provision for interest at the rate of 5 per cent; and there was a prayer for the reformation of the note in this respect. This allegation and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Wood v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Post v. LoseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Commonwealth Nat. Bank of Dallas, Tex. v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Coburn v. WebbIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Dickerman v. MinerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schram v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  2. Southern California Edison Co., Limited v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  3. Smith v. HoughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  4. Throp v. ChaloupkaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  5. Southern California Edison Co., Limited v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API