Legal Opinion
Southern California Edison Co., Limited v. Hurley
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 25, 1953No. 13143PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Circuit Judge.
This is the same action with which we had to deal in Hurley v. Southern California Edison Co., 9 Cir., 183 F.2d 125. After our decision in that case the action was again tried and a judgment was entered in favor of Hurley, plaintiff in the action, and Southern California Edison Company has appealed.
The action was brought by Hurley to require it to account for dividends on its stock and certain stock rights which the Company is asserted to have paid out and delivered to the wrong person. The action concerns dividends and stock rights relating to two separate groups of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Casey v. . KastelNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Rice v. Bennington County Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- In Re Estate of FulkOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- Smith v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rosenberg v. C. W. Clarke Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Al-Mousa v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Al-Mousa v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Al-Mousa v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- E. S. McKendry Florence Lowe Barnes, Also Known as Pancho Barnes, and William Emmert Barnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.