Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hough

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 9, 1960No. 49865PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHays, J.

This is a law action tried to the court without a jury. As originally pleaded, plaintiff sought judgment for $3000 based upon a promissory note. After the trial had commenced and plaintiff had offered considerable evidence, the court granted plaintiff the right to recast her pleadings. Under an amended and substituted petition, plaintiff in Count I asked judgment on a $2500 promissory note, and by Count II asked judgment for $500 for money loaned to defendant on open account. As to Count I defendant pleaded payment and a material alteration of the note; as to Count II defendant pleaded a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wentland v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. Robinson v. ReedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  3. Shiffer v. MosierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Knapp v. KnappSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  5. Dille v. LongwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phillips v. FosterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  2. City of Burlington v. Citizens to Protect Our FreedomsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. Kaperonis v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  4. Phillips v. FosterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API