United States v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
Under each of two indictments for housebreaking and larceny, the defendant Mitchell was separately tried and convicted, but his convictions were reversed by the Court of Appeals, 138 F. 2d 426, solely on the ground that the admission of testimony of Mitchell’s oral confessions and of stolen property secured from his home through his consent was barred by our decision in McNabb v. United *66States, 318 U. S. 332. In view of the importance to federal criminal justice of proper application of the McNabb doctrine, we brought the case here.
Practically the whole body of the law of evidence governing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by458 opinions
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lyons v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Commonwealth v. FutchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Upshaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
453 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.