Legal Opinion

Lane v. Urbahn

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 24, 1926No. 7531. [fn*]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is the third appeal in this cause. 246 S.W. 1070; 265 S.W. 1063. The facts are so fully stated in former opinions that they will not be restated here except as they relate to the particular matters discussed. The suit was brought by Albert Urbahn, the lessor, against the Rio Grande Oil Gas Company, an Oklahoma corporation, the lessee, and its stockholders and directors, for damages and for cancellation of an oil and gas lease covering a 53,000-acre ranch in Webb county. The lease contract was in the usual form of oil and gas leases, except that it embraced two additional provisions,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lane v. UrbahnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Lane v. UrbahnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wisdom v. MinchenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Cassel v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Hillman v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API