Legal Opinion

Lane v. Urbahn

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 26, 1924No. 7200. [fn*]PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This -cause has been tried and disposed of in the court below largely in disregard of the opinion of this court on a former appeal; the questions now presented being practically the same as those raised and disposed of in the former appeal. 246 S. W. 1070. There is no occasion to restate the facts in detail, nor discuss those questions at length.

The suit was brought by Urbahn against Lane and others to cancel an oil and gas lease covering land owned by Urbahn in Webb county. The right to cancel was based upon alleged false and fraudulent representations and promises, by which it is contended…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. GieseckeTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Benavides v. HuntTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Waco Tap Railroad v. ShirleyTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Texas Co. v. CurryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Lane v. UrbahnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sun Oil Co. v. BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Wisdom v. MinchenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Shell Oil Co. v. GoodroeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. Adams v. CannanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Winn v. CollinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API