Legal Opinion
Ra Medical Systems, Inc. v. Photomedex, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 9, 2010No. 08-56477UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
PhotoMedex, Inc. appeals the district court’s dismissal of its Lanham Act and California state law misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition, and false advertising counterclaims against Dean Stewart Irwin and Ra Medical Systems, Inc. (collectively “Ra Medical”). The court held (1) the misappropriation of trade secrets claim and the other claims based on allegations of such misappropriation were barred by the statute of limitations; (2) pursuant to its summary judgment decision in PhotoMedex’s first federal action, before us on appeal in Case No. 07-56672, PhotoMedex…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Newcal Industries, Inc. v. IKON Office SolutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Regina (Rega) Jablon v. Dean Witter & Co., and Sydney TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Supermail Cargo, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sussman-Automatic Corp. v. Spa World Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Beaver v. Tarsadia HotelsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Allen v. Similasan Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2015
- Access Optical Networks, Inc. v. Seagate Technology LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025