Legal Opinion

Access Optical Networks, Inc. v. Seagate Technology LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 21, 2025No. 5:24-cv-03745Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ACCESS OPTICAL NETWORKS, INC., Case No. 24-cv-03745-EKL 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 121 Defendant. 11 12 13 Plaintiff Access Optical Networks, Inc. (“AON”) alleges that Defendant Seagate 14 Technology LLC (“Seagate”) misappropriated its trade secrets and breached the parties’ non- 15 disclosure agreements. Seagate moves for summary judgment on the basis that AON’s claims are 16 time-barred. Mot. for Summ. J., ECF No. 121 (“Motion”). The Court…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API