Legal Opinion
Allen v. Similasan Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 30, 2015No. Case No. 12-cv-376 BAS (JLB)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND (2)DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION [ECFs 103, 109]
CYNTHIA BASHANT, District Judge.
On February 10, 2012, Plaintiff Kim Allen sued Defendant Similasan Corporation, claiming Defendant made misrepresentations on the labels of its homeopathic products. On October 11, 2013, Plaintiffs Kim Allen, Lainie Rideout, and Kathleen Hair-ston filed the operative Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”, ECF 58). Allen was then dismissed with prejudice on December 30, 2013. ECF 69. Six…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lucas v. Breg, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2016
- Lewert v. Boiron, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Ali v. Sanofi US Services IncDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Beasley v. Lucky Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Bekins v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LPDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.