Legal Opinion

Kalil v. Johanns

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 26, 2005No. CIV.A.01-2194 RJLPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LEON, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Thomas Kalil, initiated the instant action against Mike Johanns, 1 Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), and plaintiffs two supervisors, Carolyn Cooksie and James Little, in their individual capacities, (collectively “defendants”) for, inter alia, inten tional infliction of emotional distress (“HED”) and violations of plaintiffs rights under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Presently before the Court is Cooksie and Little’s renewed motion for partial dismissal pursuant to Rules…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  5. Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Agudas Chasidei Chabad v. Russian FederationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. Davis v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. Kittner v. GatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Mica SAINT-JEAN, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DefendantDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API