Legal Opinion
Stalexport v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 23, 1995No. Consolidated Court No. 93-09-00553-INJPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Tsoucalas, Judge:
This action is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motions for judgment on the administrative record pursuant to Rule 56.2 of the Rules of this Court. Foreign plaintiffs Stalexport and Huta Czestochowa (“Stalexport”), a Polish plate exporter and a Polish plate steel mill, respectively; Metalexportimport S.A. (“Metalexportimport”), a Romanian steel exporter; Rautaruukki Oy (“Rautaruukki”), a Finnish plate producer; and Fabrique de Fer de Charleroi, S.A. (“Charleroi”), a Belgian plate producer, (collectively “Respondents”), challenge the United States International Trade…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Altx, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- BIC Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Consolidated Bearings Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.