Legal Opinion

Carmichael v. Stonkus

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 31, 2012No. AC 32549PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J.

The named defendant, John J. Stonkus, 1 appeals from the order of the trial court severing the cross complaint filed by the defendant Margaret Carmichael Brushie from the complaint of the plaintiffs Stanrod T. Carmichael and Marietta A. Carmichael. He argues that the court abused its discretion in severing the cross complaint and that the court impeded his appeal rights. Carmichael Brushie argues, however, that this court should decline to review any of the defendant’s claims on the grounds that the defendant failed to provide an adequate record for review and inadequately…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Label Systems Corp. v. Samad AghamohammadiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Russell v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. Alpha Crane Service, Inc. v. Capitol Crane Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  4. Altfeter v. Borough of NaugatuckConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. Paoletta v. Anchor Reef Club at Branford, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. StonkusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  2. State v. HearlConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  3. Fishbein v. MenchettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  4. Litvack v. ArtusioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. Jordan v. BillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API