Legal Opinion

The San Remo Hotel L.P. v. San Francisco City And County

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 14, 2004No. 03-15853PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

364 F.3d 1088

The SAN REMO HOTEL L.P.; Thomas Field; Robert Field; T & R Investment Corp., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

SAN FRANCISCO CITY AND COUNTY, a Municipal Corporation; Department of City Planning; City Planning Commission; Opinion Board of Permit Appeals; Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 03-15853.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 8, 2004.

Filed April 14, 2004.

Paul F. Utrecht (argued), San Francisco, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Andrew W. Schwartz (argued), Office of the City Attorney, San…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Banga v. First USA, NADistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. Levin v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  3. Spoklie v. State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Doordash, Inc. v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  5. In re: Narinder SanghaUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API