Spoklie v. State of Montana
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
' WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Kim J. and Cindy R. Kafka, Diamond K Ranch Enterprises L.L.C., Robert Spoklie, and Spoklie Enterprises L.L.C. challenge a Montana ballot initiative, Proposition 1-143, on federal and state constitutional grounds. We affirm the district court’s denial of a motion to stay proceedings in the federal court pursuant to Railroad Commission of Texas v. Pullman Co., 312 U.S. 496, 61 S.Ct. 643, 85 L.Ed. 971 (1941). We hold that the Kafkas’ claims against the State of Montana and the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks are precluded by the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kamaole Pointe Development LP v. County of MauiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2008
- Spoklie v. MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005