Legal Opinion

State v. Gordon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 10, 2015No. UC7718711, UI7718721; A152242PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, C. J.

The state appeals the trial court’s order suppressing evidence that resulted from a traffic stop. For the reasons explained below, we conclude that the trial court erroneously concluded that the officer did not have probable cause for the stop based on its factual finding that defendant did not commit a traffic violation, and we vacate and remand for the trial court to apply the proper legal analysis.

In reviewing a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress, we are bound by its express and implicit factual findings that are supported by constitutionally sufficient evidence in the record.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. MatthewsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. TiffinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. State v. IsleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API