Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Keizer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 2003PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

The issue common to both appeals is whether there is a jurisdictional defect that can be raised following defendants’ pleas. In both cases, we conclude that there was no jurisdictional defect, and that defendants forfeited their claims by their pleas.

I

People v Keizer

Defendant Morgan Keizer was charged by misdemeanor complaint with petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree after he allegedly attempted to leave a Barnes & Noble bookstore with two books that he had not purchased. The complaint was supported by an affidavit, in which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. IannoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. SelikoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. People v. HansenNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. People v. CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. People v. KalinNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. People v. KoniecznyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. People v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. People v. SyllaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005
  5. People v. TigerNew York Court of Appeals · 2018

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API