People v. Jackson
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Graffeo, J.
After he was found with marihuana during a traffic stop, defendant Samuel Jackson pleaded guilty to criminal possession of marihuana in the fifth degree. On appeal, he argued that the accusatory instrument charging him with that crime was jurisdictionally deficient because it failed to adequately allege that he was in a “public place” and that the marihuana was “open to public view”—two elements of the fifth degree possession offense. Rejecting defendant’s argument, the Appellate Term affirmed defendant’s conviction (27 Misc 3d 5 [2010]) as do we.
*741While operating…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. KalinNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. KoniecznyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. DreydenNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. KeizerNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- People v. BoulaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- The People v. Matthew P.New York Court of Appeals · 2015
- People v. LivingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- The People v. Michael SansNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- Mahmood v. NielsenDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.