Legal Opinion

People v. Hansen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 2000PublishedCited by 434 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Kaye.

In this prosecution for burglary and related charges, the issue is whether a defendant who pleaded guilty forfeited the right to contend that the fact-finding process of the Grand Jury, culminating in an indictment against him, was impaired by the prosecutor’s introduction of inadmissible hearsay.

During the Grand Jury presentation, the complainant, Harold Stickney, testified that shortly after midnight his wife awoke him after hearing noises outside their home, and called 911; that he saw defendant on their back porch holding a snow shovel; that he watched…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. People v. IannoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by434 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. People v. KoniecznyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. People v. DumayNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. People v. DreydenNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. The People v. Anthony N. PacherilleNew York Court of Appeals · 2015

429 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API