Loud v. Collins
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Chas. Monroe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action to recover $1,300 and interest at the rate of five per cent per month, compounded monthly, alleged to be due and unpaid upon a promissory note dated, “Los Angeles, Cal., January 17th, 1903,” made payable generally to Watson & Company, by whom it was transferred for collection to plaintiff. Judgment went against defendant Collins by default. Defendants Kemp and Alder-son answered, alleging, among other defenses, that the action was barred by section 339, subdivision 1, Code of Civil Procedure. Among other things, the court found: “The note sued on in this case and set out in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bank of Yolo v. Sperry Flour Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Ivey v. Kern County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Barrett v. DodgeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1890
- Higgins v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Wells, Fargo & Co. v. VansickleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1894
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gas Appliance Sales Co. v. W. B. Bastian Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- McIntire v. RaskinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Navajo County Bank v. DolsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Morello v. Growers Grape Products Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- People v. LarueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.