Legal Opinion

Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Vansickle

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada

Decided December 12, 1894No. 580PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This was an action by Wells, Fargo & Co. against P. W. Vansickle upon a promissory note. The case was tried by the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtHawley, District Judge

(orally). This is an action at law upon a promissory note which reads as follows:

“84,000.00. San Francisco, Cal., March 29, 1887.
“Two years after date, for value received, I promise to pay to the order of W. W. Lapham, at Wells, Fargo & Co.’s Bank, in this city, in gold coin, four thousand dollars, with interest, in like coin, from the date hereof, at the rate of one per cent, per month until paid; payable monthly, and, if not so paid, to become part of the principal, and bear like rate of interest.
“P. W. Vansickle.”

This note, before maturity, was, for value received, transferred and assigned…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hyde v. . GoodnowNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. Flanagan v. Meyer & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1867
  3. King v. FlemingIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Fritsch v. HeislenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Franklin BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  2. Curry v. Wright, Sr.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Loud v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API