Legal Opinion

Ivey v. Kern County Land Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1896No. L. A. No. 171PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Kern County granting a change of place of trial. A. R. Conklin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Haynes, C.

Plaintiff brought this action in the county of Kern for damages for breach of a certain contract whereby the defendant agreed to sell and convey to the plaintiff certain lands situate in said county of Kern. The defendant filed a demurrer to the complaint, and also a notice of motion and a demand for a change of the place of trial from said county to the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco. Said motion was granted, and the plaintiff appeals from the order granting said motion.

The grounds upon which said motion was based are as follows: “1. That the contract sued…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Scudder v. Union National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Mactier's Administrators v. FrithCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
  3. Clark v. DalesNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Minnesota Linseed Oil Co. v. Collier White Lead Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1876
  5. Ames v. McCamberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Moran v. MoranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Cochran v. EllsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Palo Alto Town & Country Village, Inc. v. Bbtc CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. LaMar v. LaMarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API