Legal Opinion

Clarke v. Fast

California Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1900No. L.A. No. 712PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, C.

This appeal is from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, based upon alleged errors of law occurring upon the trial, and upon the further ground that the verdict of the jury was not justified by the evidence.

After the jury was sworn counsel for plaintiff read the pleadings and moved the court to direct the defendant to first introduce evidence in support of his affirmative defense. The court so directed, and the defendant excepted, and assigns this ruling as one of the errors upon which he relies for a reversal of the order.

The plaintiffs are the widow and minor son…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peugh v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Villa v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Brooks v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Myers v. Sierra Valley Stock & Agricultural Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Salter v. UlrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Fort v. ColbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. Foster v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Cordano v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Stoneman v. FritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API