Legal Opinion
Matthews v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 29, 2004No. 3D04-2909PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
891 So.2d 596 (2004)
William E. MATTHEWS, Petitioner,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 3D04-2909.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
December 29, 2004.
Rehearing Denied January 21, 2005.
William E. Matthews, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for respondent.
Before GERSTEN, FLETCHER, and WELLS, JJ.
2Per curiam
We deny William E. Matthews' petition for writ of mandamus, through which he seeks to compel the trial court to correct his habitual offender sentence, pursuant to Blakely v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). We note first that…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- McBride v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- In re: Will C. Dean, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY v. McClaneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
4Cited by6 opinions
- Calloway v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Tillman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY v. McClaneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Jerome v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Paul v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.