Legal Opinion

Jerome v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 2, 2005No. 3D04-2998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) was properly denied. As we recently reiterated in Matthews v. State, 891 So.2d 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004) does not apply retroactively to motions for post-conviction relief. Defendants whose convictions became final prior to June 24, 2004 (the date Blakely was decided) may therefore not seek Rule 3.800 relief pursuant to Blakely. Appellant was convicted in June 1995 and his conviction become final on appeal in September 1996 —…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Matthews v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. Jerome v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API