Legal Opinion
In re: Will C. Dean, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 9, 2004No. 04-13244PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE PANEL:
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255 and 2244(b)(3)(A), as amended by §§ 105 and 106 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), Will C. Dean, Jr. has filed an application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside,, or correct his federal sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Such authorization may be granted only if this Court certifies that the second or successive motion contains a claim involving:(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- In re: John Ruthell HenryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- McBride v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- William S. Simpson, Applicant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- In Re: Jerry J. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.