Legal Opinion
Paul v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 30, 2005No. 4D05-667PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
898 So.2d 1128 (2005)
Emanuel PAUL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D05-667.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 30, 2005.
Emanuel Paul, Crawfordville, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
2Per curiam
We affirm the order summarily denying Mr. Paul's rule 3.850 motion challenging his departure sentence as a violation of the principles set forth in Blakely v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), reh'g denied, ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 21, 159 L.Ed.2d 851 (2004); and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- McBride v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Burrows v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Cortes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006