Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Stem
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 28, 1990No. 89-506PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
William Stem filed an action against Gary Braden, seeking to rescind a contract for the sale of an automobile and to obtain the return of the purchase price plus interest. The trial court granted Stem that relief, but the Court of Civil Appeals reversed the trial court's judgment.
On February 26, 1987, Stem purchased a used automobile from Braden for $6,600. Braden indicated to Stem that, to the best of his knowledge, the car had not been wrecked and that the car was in good condition. Less than a week after purchasing the car, Stem discovered a disconnected plug that, when it was connected,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jorgensen v. PressnallOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Moore v. Howard Pontiac-American, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
- Johannsen v. Minnesota Valley Ford Tractor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Stroh v. American Recreation & Mobile Home Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1975
- Staggs v. Herff Motor Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Liarikos v. MelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Page v. Dobbs Mobile Bay, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Huntsville Hospital v. Mortara InstrumentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Braden v. StemCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- Huntsville Hospital, a Public Health Care Authority v. Mortara Instrument, Defendant-Third-Party v. Rusty Dickerson, Individually D/B/A Quality Rep Services, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995