Legal Opinion

Perel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 2003PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

¶ 1 We consider post judgment interest: when it begins to accrue and when it ends.

¶ 2 Plaintiffs-appellants Lois and Marvin Perel were awarded underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits from defendant-appellee Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (LMIC) at arbitration proceedings. LMIC paid the principal amount of the award plus some post judgment interest. By petition to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, the Perels sought additional post judgment interest, but this request was denied. The Perels filed this timely appeal. 1 We reverse and remand.

¶ 3 The arbitration took place on June 5…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sage v. GreenspanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Kessler v. Old Guard Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Diskin v. Philadelphia Police Pension Fund Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Cotterman v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Equitable Gas Co. v. WadeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Romaine v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Hutchison Ex Rel. Hutchison v. LuddySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Interdigital Communications Corp. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. RHINO SERVICES, LLC v. DEANGELO BROTHERS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Romaine v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API