Legal Opinion

Kessler v. Old Guard Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 1990No. 1368PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The issue in this appeal is whether insureds who have recovered a final judgment against their fire insurance carriers can refuse to satisfy the judgment unless the carriers pay them pre-judgment and post-judgment interest in addition to the amount of the judgment. This issue was submitted to the trial court in a separate action for declaratory judgment and was decided in favor of the insureds. We hold that the plaintiff insureds could properly require the insurer-defendants to pay post-judgment interest from the date of the verdict but that the plaintiffs could not refuse to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fish v. GosnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Sack v. FeinmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Fernandez v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Sands v. Pa. Ins. Guaranty Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Gold & Co. v. Northeast Theater Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Arch v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Allegheny Energy Supply Co. v. Wolf Run Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Lucas v. PorterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Barnes v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Pettit v. NamieCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API