Legal Opinion

Tyrues v. Shinseki

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 10, 2013No. 2013-7007PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge TARANTO.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.

TARANTO, Circuit Judge.

Larry G. Tyrues, a veteran of the United States Army who served in the Persian Gulf, sought disability benefits under two different standards. In September 1998, the Board of Veterans’ Appeals rejected his claim to benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1110, because his lung condition lacked the required service connection, but remanded to the Department of Veterans’ Affairs Regional Office for further consideration of whether his chronic symptoms manifested Persian Gulf Syndrome,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Brown v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Adway Maggitt, Jr., Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Evelyn M. Todd v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014
  2. Mote v. WilkieCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  3. Jay A. Boyd v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014
  4. Antonio Pacheco v. Sloan D. GibsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014
  5. Antonio Pacheco v. Sloan D. GibsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API