Legal Opinion
Ross v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 2, 1989No. 540-87CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
YOCK, Judge.
This case is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Defendant’s motion is based on the contention that the complaint was filed after the expiration of the statute of limitations. Plaintiff opposes defendant’s motion to dismiss and has filed his own motion for correction of the filing date of the complaint. For the reasons set forth herein, defendant’s motion is denied, and *380plaintiff’s motion for a corrected filing date is granted.
Facts
On April 10, 1985, the United States Department of Agriculture (Forest Service) contracted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Parissi v. Telechron, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Edwin C. Covington v. Aubrey Cole, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Jaspercounty, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- LaFont v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Walther v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Cleek Aviation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Liu v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- James M. Langan, Jr., as the of the Estate of Eleanor F. Langan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.