Legal Opinion

Bank of Italy v. Newman

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 29, 1924No. Civ. No. 4870PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Sure, J.

Charles J. Newman died testate, leaving surviving as his only heirs at law -a widow, a brother, five sisters, and a niece. The niece was not mentioned in the will. A stepdaughter was named among the legatees. The Bank of Italy was named as trustee, vested with the usual powers.

An appeal from the decree of distribution in the estate of said decedent brings the will before us for construction. The main question is concerned with the interpretation of a trust created by the will. The provisions in dispute are as follows:

“(B) The said Trustee shall pay all the net income from said trust estate in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McConnell v. DoolittleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. In Re the Will of BumpNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Estate of WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Whall v. ConverseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  5. In Re Estate of HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Church Home for Children of Protestant Episcopal Church v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Estate of GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Estate of Axcelrod v. PockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Estate of ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API