Legal Opinion

Prader v. Grimm

California Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1865PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Sixth Judicial District, Sacramento County. Plaintiff recovered judgment in the Court below, and defendants appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*12By the Court,

Sanderson, C. J.

This is an action upon an injunction bond, and was tried under the law of appeals as it stood prior to the passage of an Act entitled. “ An Act to regulate appeals in this State.” (Statutes 1861, p. 589.) The trial was by the Court, and the judgment was for the plaintiff. The only point which it is necessary for us to notice is to the effect that the finding does not sustain the judgment.

The finding is in the following words :

“ From the evidence in this case, the Court finds all the issues.in favor of the plaintiff except as to the amount of damages claimed; and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Willson v. McEvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Elder v. KutnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Reachi v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Wittich v. O'NealSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
  4. Dean v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Ohio Electric Car Co. v. Le SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API