Wittich v. O'Neal
Supreme Court of Florida
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia county. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chief Justice delivered the opinion of the court:
The questions presented by the record are:
1st. In ¡a suit on the bond given to obtain a temporary injunction are counsel fees, incurred to dissolve the injunction, damages that may be recovered ?
2d. Is it essential that the plaintifi in such suit should have actually paid such fees, or is it sufficient that he has become liable therefor ?
The record shows that a temporary injunction was issued in a suit then pending between the surviving partners of the firm of Keyser, Judah & Co., and W. L. Wittich, and that the injunction was dissolved “…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Behrens v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Garrett v. LoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
- Ah Thaie v. Quan WanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
- Prader v. GrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Brown v. JonesNevada Supreme Court · 1870
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. L. Bucki & Son Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- S AND T BUILDERS v. Globe Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Roger Dean Chevrolet, Inc. v. Painters, Etc., Local No. 452District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Webb v. BealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.