ROYAL AUTOMOTIVE, INC. v. City of Vestavia Hills
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Royal Automotive, Inc., Saturn of Birmingham, Inc., Vulcan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., and Trimensions, Inc. (collectively "the businesses"), sued the City of Vestavia Hills and the City of Hoover in the Jefferson Circuit Court, alleging trespass, nuisance, and negligent maintenance of a natural waterway known as Patton Creek. The businesses' claims arise from damage caused by the flooding of Patton Creek in 2002. Vulcan-Lincoln Mercury also alleges damage from a flood of Patton Creek that occurred in 2004. The businesses appeal from a summary judgment in favor of Vestavia and Hoover. We affirm.
I.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Ex Parte Alfa Mut. General Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Ex Parte LumpkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Long v. City of AthensCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- Furin v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
- Chavers v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- Smith v. City of AtmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
- The City of Mountain Brook v. Rodney E. Miller and Mary Leah MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2026