Legal Opinion

ROYAL AUTOMOTIVE, INC. v. City of Vestavia Hills

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 23, 2008No. 1061313 and 1071152PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Royal Automotive, Inc., Saturn of Birmingham, Inc., Vulcan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., and Trimensions, Inc. (collectively "the businesses"), sued the City of Vestavia Hills and the City of Hoover in the Jefferson Circuit Court, alleging trespass, nuisance, and negligent maintenance of a natural waterway known as Patton Creek. The businesses' claims arise from damage caused by the flooding of Patton Creek in 2002. Vulcan-Lincoln Mercury also alleges damage from a flood of Patton Creek that occurred in 2004. The businesses appeal from a summary judgment in favor of Vestavia and Hoover. We affirm.

I.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Ex Parte Alfa Mut. General Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Ex Parte LumpkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Long v. City of AthensCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  2. Furin v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  3. Chavers v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  4. Smith v. City of AtmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
  5. The City of Mountain Brook v. Rodney E. Miller and Mary Leah MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API