Ex Parte Lumpkin
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants were guilty of fraud in connection with a lease of property in Gadsden on which the plaintiffs had intended to operate a bar.
The plaintiffs claim that, during lease negotiations, the defendants fraudulently promised that the defendants could acquire for the plaintiffs a lease on property adjacent to the leased premises; that adjacent property was needed in order for the plaintiffs to meet zoning requirements of the City of Gadsden for the operation of a bar. More specifically, the plaintiffs alleged that the failure of the defendants to acquire the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Wilson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Armstrong Business Services, Inc. v. AmSouth BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Ex Parte Alfa Mut. General Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Payton v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Ex Parte HealthSouth Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.