Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Smith v. City of Atmore

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 25, 2015No. 1130167Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMoore, Chief Justice

Marshall Dean Smith has appealed the summary judgment entered by the Escam-bia Circuit Court (“the trial court”) in favor of the City of Atmore (“the City”) in Smith’s lawsuit alleging claims of negligent design and construction of the City’s water-drainage system, negligent maintenance of the City’s water-drainage system, continuing trespass, and nuisance. Although I concur to affirm the summary judgment as to the negligent-design and -construction claims, I respectfully dissent from this Court’s decision to affirm the summary judgment as to the other claims because I believe that Smith…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nationwide Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. DPF ARCHITECTSSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Hilliard v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Reichert v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Long v. City of AthensCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  5. ROYAL AUTOMOTIVE, INC. v. City of Vestavia HillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API