Legal Opinion

Borger v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 8, 2009No. 08-3685PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.

Railworkers Robert Borger and Derrick Atkinson sued CSX Transportation under the Federal Employers Liability Act, alleging injuries from exposure to hydrochloric acid fumes. For the reasons described below, we AFFIRM the district court’s entry of summary judgment in CSX’s favor.

I

On June 21, 2004, Robert Borger, Sr. and Derrick J. Atkinson worked together as engineer and conductor on a CSX train heading south from Troy, Ohio to Cincinnati. A northbound CSX train from Cincinnati needed to pass on the same track, so Borger stopped his train in a siding…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Scottsdale Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
  2. Myrick v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  3. Harper v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
  4. Keach v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2017
  5. Marshall v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API