Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided May 9, 2011No. Case No. 1:09-cv-754PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON FELA LIABILITY
PAUL L. MALONEY, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is an action under the Federal Employers Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. (“FELA”), which the parties agree is plaintiff Wayne L. Marshall (“Marshall”)’s sole remedy for on-duty injuries allegedly sustained during the course of his employment with defendant Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company (“the railroad”). Marshall seeks FELA damages for injuries allegedly sustained in four accidents which occurred in February 2006, January…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mark DeLeon v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2026
- Nelson v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020