Legal Opinion
Keach v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine
Decided July 7, 2017No. Case No. 13-10670; Adv. Proc. No. 14-1001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
Peter G. Cary, Judge
Pending before me is Canadian Pacific Railway Company and Soo Line Railroad Company’s (“CP” and “Soo Line,” .respectively and the “Defendants,” jointly) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Robert J. Reach’s (the “Estate Representative”) Third Amended Complaint (Docket Entry “DE” 230) (the “Complaint”).1 This motion (the “Motion to Dismiss”) is predicated on two general grounds: forum non conveniens and multiple theories contesting the adequacy of the Complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), made applicable to this proceeding by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7012(b). For…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-BursetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Haley v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re: Anthony D. Pettegrow and Josette G. Pettegrow v. Lobster 207, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2026
- James F. WhittakerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Roy v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021